weblog o lidech, společnosti a internetu

Komentáře k článku - Regulované nenájemné

• Zpět na zápis

And pathetic CSSD kept crying that ODS and other parties "prerozdelovali" too much and that everybody is too corrupt and that everything that happened before 1998 is very bad.

"CSSD will fix all of that" they said. "CSSD will lead this country out of peverty" they said. "CSSD is the way to go" they said.

I say: "CSSD will destroy all the good which was done during the first few years of the right ruling this fine country".

"CSSD will lead this country INTO poverty with their hypocritical and superficial behaviour to the public and so-called reforms (which are all long winded talks and NO action IMHO)". They said that ODS took from the people - but look what they are doing RIGHT NOW! Taking from everyone and pouring the finances into their own pockets. Hypocrites! Grrrr...

"CSSD is the way to devastation" Zeman was bad... Oh, how I shook my head with the way he 'represented' our country and all the crap he would say. BUT IMHO Spidla is far, far worse. He is a fence sitting snake who would more likely than not stab anyone in the back who does not conform to his "policies" and I believe that deep in his mind he admires dictators because he wishes he could be like one them. Just look at the way he dictates and supresses free speech and opinion in his own party. Oh, how he would love to do the same to this country.

Excuse me if I have offended anyone or if I have poked my head into the hornets nest of contraversial politics - but I just had to voice my opinion now.

Nesouhlasim. Tenhle pricip prispevku na cokoli je zvraceny od sameho zacatku. Ve firmach je to cesta jak prispet zamestnancum mimo vyplatni pasku, a vyhnout se tak vyssi dani. V konecnem dusledku pak stat vymysli takove ptakoviny, jako prispevek firme, ktera zamestna nezamestnaneho. Kdyby se snizily dane, IMHO zamestnaji firmy tech nezamestnanych vic, nez s nejakym prispevkem.

Kratce receno: Co nejmene prerozdelovani. Tohle radoby socialni chovani, pokud bude ve stejne mire pokracovat, jednou skonci serednym krachem, az za par let zjistime, ze neni co prerozdelovat.

Je preci normalni, ze zamestnavatel prispiva na bydleni svym zamestnancum, kteri musi dojizdet. Pokud jsme si ty poslance zvolili sami, meli bychom tem, co dojizdi, take prispet na bydleni.

Jina vec je ovsem nase praxe - bydleni v Nerudove ulici? Prispevek 14 tisic?

Problem je stejny jako vzdy - princip je spravny, ale konkretni provedeni horsi nez spatne :-(